In 1871, Baron Rothschild was quoted to say “Buy when there’s blood in the streets!”. Say what you will about the Baron, there is no denying he made a ton of money.
People have fled the stock market, and with good reason. With the stock market collapse of 2008, the advent of high frequency traders, allegations of front-running, Bernie Maddoff's ponzi scheme, high unemployment rates, an anemic economy, incompetence at the Fed (QE1, QE2, Twist, … ), wall street bailouts, too big to fail (and the corresponding too little to succeed), near 0% interest rates - combined with banks who aren't lending, politicians looking for higher taxes, government deficit spending out of control, fear of sovereign debt collapse in Europe, the housing collapse, bank bailouts (as opposed to wall street bailouts in 2008), the tsunami/nuclear issue in Japan, middle east unrest, the BP oil spill and resulting environmental damage to the gulf coast region, and combine that with the Dow's miserable -4.62% return (year to date), it's no wonder.
The stock market is bleeding, but I don't see blood in the streets here in general. The various bailouts have led to moral hazard, and markets are kept afloat via injections of various flavors of quantitative easing.
The blood in the streets I see comes from market manipulators. The typical scenario goes something like this. A group of short sellers target a company. They take a massive short position. Then they start rumors on the street of fraud or embezzlement. When the public hears about this, the stock tanks. As the stock tanks, we automatic stop losses triggered, and the stock continues to tank. Then the original short sellers cover at significantly lower prices, netting huge gains. Meanwhile, there are secondary traders who jump on the band-wagon continuing to short, hopping to drive the price down even further. These new shorts are working off the greater fool theory. If they can create enough rumor and innuendo, then they hope to drive the price lower, and get out.
So, what can companies do to defend themselves in these times? Well, SilverCorp (SVM) has recently been the subject of such an attack. A massive short position of 23 million shares was initiated, followed by an anonymous letter alleging fraud and accounting malfeasance. This was followed, by internet rumors sourced from AlfredLittle.com. AlfredLittle cites International Financial Research & Analysis Group. Going to the IFRA web site, we find a total of 4 pages, a single contact email, and a single phone number. There is no address given. In fact there is no time time zone specified, so not only do you not know where in the world this firm is located (and what financial standards are expected in that location), you don't really know when to call them. In fact, there are no times given for phone number contacts. (As a side note, if you google IFRA, the top hit is the International Fragrance Association). This leads me to conclude that International Financial Research & Analysis is a bogus web site, and if AlfredLittle is citing their analysis, then AlfredLittle's reputation /credentials/motivations come into question.
Finally, we see ambulance chaser lawyers initiating an "investigation". Their investigation consists of only looking at SilverCorp financials, hoping to find any irregularities, and net a nice fee from a class action lawsuit.
The CEO (Rui Feng) of SilverCorp is pissed, and he's not taking it lying down. He's telling everyone about what happened, and providing his side of the story. He's opened up his books, tax records, and bank statements. Rui Feng has sent out an open letter to SilverCorp shareholders, responding point for point to each of the allegations put forth from the anonymous letter and AlfredLittle.
My personal opinion is that the original short sellers are out of the game, having sold or covered their short positions, and the current shorts are working off momentum. Why do I think this? Because it took about $200 Million to initiate this short position. That means it probably didn't start from some rinky dink boiler room operation out of Long Island, but somebody with a lot of money, or access to a lot of money. So chances are the current holders of the short position are secondary players - probably a bunch of them who are riding on momentum. Like jackals who feast after the lion departed, they are not strong players. But their problem is that SilverCorp has over $230 Million cash in the bank, and no debt, and issues a dividend. Last quarter, SilverCorp was netting $34 million, and they are spending that money to buy back SVM stock at discounted prices. As of September 15, the company has purchased $31 million of shares. If silver prices maintain their current prices, then SilverCorp can keep buying back shares every quarter. Silver production is up 15% and gold production is up 30% (from year ago levels). Which means even if prices don't increase, their cash flow is increasing. If silver prices do go up, then who knows where this stock might go.
At current prices ($7.13 as of 09/21/2011), we're looking at a trailing twelve month PE ratio of 15 with a dividend yield of 1.2%.
For 6 months of the last year, the price of silver was significantly cheaper than it is today. So if we take today's price of silver, and project it twelve months forward, then we're looking at a forward PE of around 12. For comparison purposes, Silver Wheaton (SLW) has a trailing PE of 29, Endeavor Silver (EXK) has a PE of 42, First Majestic (AG) has a PE of 26, and Hecla Mining (AG) has a PE of 25.
Make no mistake, there is a war going on for SilverCorp shares. I suspect that the original shorts have already covered, netting their gains, and that all that's left now are the secondary shorts. If Rui Feng is successful, he'll squeeze them and SilverCorp shares will recover in price, outpacing other stocks due to the suppression by the shorts. There's another possibility. Rui Feng has indicated he is fearful of a hostile takeover - somebody purchasing the company outright at depressed prices. SilverCorp has no debt, and is in great shape financially, so this is a real possibility.
My personal opinion is that any weak hands who are long SVM have been shaken out. Others may have doubled down on their bet - lowering the average share purchase price. If somebody attempts a hostile takeover, they will have to do so at above market prices, and it will immediately show that the stock is undervalued. As a result, the current shorts would get blown out of the water, due to a rising share price. It is possible that a hostile takeover attempt could even trigger a bidding war, and we could see share prices skyrocket. Hence, I don't really think a hostile takeover is really in the cards for SVM.
But there's blood in the streets today. A year ago, Silvercorp was trading for $8.22. Today it's around $7.13. A year ago, the spot price of silver was around $20/oz. Today it's $40/oz. With a trailing PE 15, it's far below similar mining shares. If Rui Feng succeeds, expect a massive blowout as the current holders the short position get squeezed. But, don't forget to thank them for the bargain they've presented.
Disclosure : I'm currently long SVM, SLW, and EXK. I'm considering going long AG and HL.
References :
Silvercorp Financials : http://silvercorpmetals.com/financials/financials/
Silvercorp Response :
http://silvercorpmetals.com/news/2011/index.php?&content_id=304
http://silvercorpmetals.com/news/2011/index.php?&content_id=307
http://silvercorpmetals.com/news/2011/index.php?&content_id=308
http://silvercorpmetals.com/news/2011/index.php?&content_id=309
http://silvercorpmetals.com/news/2011/index.php?&content_id=318
Casey Research Report (reprint)
http://silvercorpmetals.com/_resources/BigGold_September_2011.pdf
Korelin Economics Report
http://www.kereport.com/2011/09/14/situation-silvercorp/
BNN Interview with Rui Feng
http://www.bnn.ca/News/2011/9/15/Silvercorp-CEO-calls-allegations-criminal.aspx
Jim Puplava Interview with Lorne Waldman of SilverCorp
http://www.financialsense.com/financial-sense-newshour/guest-expert/2011/09/17/03/lorne-waldman-silvercorp-responds-to-allegations
Jim Puplava Interview with Keith M Barron PhD, Leanne Baker PhD, and David Morgan regarding SilverCorp
(various experts in the silver industry)
http://www.financialsense.com/financial-sense-newshour/guest-expert/2011/09/17/02/silver-stocks-fraud-or-manipulation
Various analysis:
http://seekingalpha.com/article/292389-silvercorp-proves-it-s-not-a-fraud?source=yahoo
http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2011/09/07/setting-the-record-straight-on-silvercorp-metals.aspx
http://www.metalaugmentor.com/analysis/charlatan-exposed-silvercorps-shorts.html
Anonymous Letter
http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Silvercorp-Notes-Large-Short-iw-1745542873.html?x=0
Alfred Little
http://alfredlittle.com/2011/09/13/silvercorp-metals-questionable-customers-geologists-production-quality-and-serious-related-party-failures/
International Financial Research & Analysis Group website
http://ifragroup.com/